Uncategorized

Increasing HDR by putting stem cells back to sleep, published in Cell Reports

When using CRISPR genome editing in stem cells, it’s far easier to break a gene with indels than to fix it with HDR. This manifests in an interesting way. If you...

READ MORE

When using CRISPR genome editing in stem cells, it’s far easier to break a gene with indels than to fix it with HDR. This manifests in an interesting way. If you monitor a “CD34+” population of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) from the bone marrow, indels start high and stay high but HDR alleles are lost over time. Why do these different genetic outcomes differ over time? Is HDR bad for the long-term stem cells? Or is editing in the CD34+ population actually heterogeneous, and different cells get different alleles? New work from postdoc Jenny Shin in the lab, out in Cell reports, both answers this question and finds a way to fix the problem.

Jenny and collaborators used a powerful combination of immunophenotyping, next generation sequencing, and single-cell RNA-sequencing to investigate and reprogram genome editing outcomes in subpopulations of adult human CD34+ HSPCs. These HSPCs are actually several different types of cells, including more differentiated progenitors that cycle and very “stemmy” long-term HSCs that are quiescent. The team found that there is a dramatic tension between HDR and quiescence in LT-HSCs.  Quiescent stem-enriched cells utilize NHEJ and exhibit almost no HDR. By contrast, non-quiescent cells with the same immunophenotype utilize both NHEJ and HDR. Quiescence is critical for engraftment and stem cell maintenance, so it was now clear that all cells in the CD34+ population get indels and the cycling progenitors were getting HDR alleles, but the quiescent LT-HSCs weren’t doing HDR.

Jenny then had a very creative idea. She asked if a previously reported small molecule cocktail, “XRC”, that maintains quiescence could be used after the fact to re-quiesce LT-HSCs. Using this new strategy and good timing, she found a way to get LT-HSCs with high levels of HDR by briefly allowing them to cycle during editing, and then inducing quiescence later on. This yielded a 6-fold increase in the HDR/NHEJ ratio in quiescent stem cells ex vivo and during long-term engraftment in mouse experiments. The re-quiescence strategy might in future be combined with engineered Cas9-geminin constructs that reduce NHEJ, further tipping the balance towards HDR. Jenny’s results highlight the tradeoffs between editing and fundamental cellular physiology and suggests strategies to manipulate quiescent cells for research and therapeutic genome editing. 

X Close

Welcome Erman, Kinga, and Markus

From left to right: Markus, Kinga, and Erman

Three people joined the lab, all in one day! Erman is a postdoc, interested in DNA repair and genome editing, Kinga...

READ MORE

From left to right: Markus, Kinga, and Erman

Three people joined the lab, all in one day! Erman is a postdoc, interested in DNA repair and genome editing, Kinga is our new lab manager, and will be keeping us all in line. Markus is a bioinformatician, working on quantifying editing outcomes from complex datasets. Welcome to the lab!

X Close

We’re hiring!

Are you interested in working on genome editing, DNA repair, and organelle quality control in a dynamic lab environment? We are seeking a technician/lab manager...

READ MORE

Are you interested in working on genome editing, DNA repair, and organelle quality control in a dynamic lab environment? We are seeking a technician/lab manager and a bioinformatics scientist. Apply at the links below.

Technician / Lab Manager

Bioinformatics Scientist

X Close

FILTERS

Tweets

Contact Us

Questions and/or comments about Corn Lab and its activities may be addressed to:

JACOB.CORN@BIOL.ETHZ.CH

Share: