Uncategorized

Proteins are essential building blocks of life, but they can become toxic to our cells if damaged, for example under oxidative stress. In turn, human cells selectively remove damaged proteins to maintain a healthy proteome. But how can cells identify individual damaged proteins among thousands of intact ones? An old hypothesis states that cells scan the proteome for chemical modifications that occur, for example, when proteins break. Are you interested in learning more about how cells combat chemical protein damage?

Have a look at our newest research breakthrough, led by postdoc Matthias Muhar in a collaboration with Jakob Farnung from the Bode group (D-CHAB) as well as with Jessberger group (UZH), Jinek group (UZH), Mann group (Max Plank Institute of Biochemistry) Germany   and Schulman group (Max Plank Institute of Biochemistry, Germany).

In this study, using a semi-synthetic chemical biology approach coupled to cellular assays, we found that C-terminal amide-bearing proteins (CTAPs) are rapidly cleared from human cells.

To identify the cellular machinery underlying CTAP clearance, we utilized a genome-wide CRISPR screen for genes that are responsible for specific degradation of C-terminally amidated proteins. We identified SCF–FBXO31 ubiquitin ligase as a key reader of C-terminal amides, marking CTAPs for proteasomal degradation. With a conserved binding pocket, FBXO31 exhibits remarkable selectivity, binding C-terminal peptides with amides while excluding non-modified proteins. This mechanism allows cell to remove CTAPs, which form when proteins break under under oxidative stress. Intriguingly, a human mutation linked to neurodevelopmental disorders alters FBXO31’s substrate recognition, leading to toxicity. These findings suggest CTAPs may represent a new class of modified amino acid degrons (MAADs) that mark proteins for removal by reader proteins and downstream effectors, offering insights into selective surveillance of chemically damaged proteins.

In conclusion, this research uncovered new signals for protein clearance and advanced our understanding of cellular protein quality control.

For more info check out our new paper in Nature!

X Close

On September 18-19 2024, the Corn Lab hosted an engaging in-person DDREAMM team retreat in Zurich, bringing together researchers for two days of scientific presentations, fruitful discussions, and the exchange of fresh ideas. The event highlighted synergies between the Jackson/Corn lab and fostered brainstorming sessions focused on the latest technologies, scientific advancements, and the evolving landscape of publications in the era of AI and preprints.

Participants also enjoyed valuable networking opportunities, including a scenic hike from Uetliberg to Felsenegg, offering breath-taking views of Zurich and its surroundings.

The retreat was highly effective, sparking new collaborations.

X Close

CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing is widely used to introduce targeted mutations in cells and organisms. During the gene editing process, Cas enzymes induces a double-strand break at a target genomic site that is subsequently repaired by on of two mechanisms: error-prone nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) that results in genomic insertions and deletions (indels), or templated homology-directed repair (HDR) to precisely insert, delete, or replace a genomic sequence.  Have you ever wondered why CRISPR-Cas mediated HDR editing is so efficient in some cells but terribly inefficient in others? Struggling with gene editing in your cells? We’ve got the solution you’ve been looking for!

We are excited to announce a significant advancement in our understanding of CRISPR-Cas9-mediated HDR through genome-wide screening conducted in Fanconi anemia (FA) patient lymphoblastic cell lines. Our research led by Postdoc Erman Karasu uncovered a single suppressor of CRISPR-Cas9 mediated HDR, revealing that exonuclease TREX1 plays a critical role in reducing HDR efficiency when the repair template is either single-stranded or linearized double-stranded DNA. TREX1 expression serves as a biomarker for CRISPR-Cas9-mediated HDR, and high levels of TREX1, observed in various cell types including U2OS, Jurkat, MDA-MB-231, primary T cells, and hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs), are predictive of poor HDR outcomes. Moreover, we have demonstrated that HDR efficiency can be significantly improved, by 2- to 8-fold, through either knockout of TREX1 or the use of chemically protected single-stranded DNA templates that are resistant to TREX1 activity. Namely, phosphorothioate 3’ end protection is sufficient for fast inexpensive improvements to HDR in contexts with appreciable TREX1 expression. These strategies offer promising avenues for enhancing CRISPR-Cas9–mediated HDR, particularly in cell types with high TREX1 expression.

Overall, our data sheds mechanistic light on why donor template protection increases HDR, provide a concrete biomarker for the targeted use of template protection, and resolve long-standing confusion around why editing works like a breeze in some cells, but fails miserably in others. This breakthrough holds substantial potential for advancing research and therapeutic applications.

For more, check out our paper, it is now out in Nature Biotechnology!

Don’t miss the explainer video highlighting Erman’s work!

X Close

The Latsis Symposium on Genome and Transcriptome Engineering, held on June 13-14, 2024 in Zurich, was a remarkable event! This dynamic two-day gathering showcased the latest breakthroughs in genome and transcriptome engineering, uniting experts from academia and industry to share new research and practical applications.

Co-organized by the Corn, Platt, Schwank, and Jinek groups, the symposium covered a wide range of topics from cutting-edge research findings to real-world therapeutic innovations.

We were particularly thrilled with the presentation by our PostDoc John Fielden!

Thanks to all who joined us for this exciting exploration of the future of biomedical science!

X Close

From June 10-12, 2024, the Corn Lab members attended the 14t^h D-BIOL Symposium in Davos. This exciting biannual internal ETHZ event brought together nearly 500 participants, including students, postdocs, professors, and special guests, to share and discuss the latest scientific developments.

A special shout-out to our very own Mathias Muhar and Eric Aird for their fantastic talks!

X Close

The Coronavirus lockdowns this spring disrupted many projects and students. But when life gives you lemons, make lemonade. In our lab, almost everyone took the stay-at-home orders as motivation to learn some coding. Sebastian Siegner, a Masters’ student at the time and now recently joined for a full Ph.D., had been working on proof-of-concept experiments for therapeutic base editing and prime editing. But he was frustrated with designing base editor gRNAs and newly-described prime editor pegRNAs by hand. So he used the lockdown to write PnB Designer, which is a fast and scalable helper to design your prime and base editing experiments. Check out the paper in BMC Bioinformatics.

PnB designer can be used to design base editing gRNAs and prime editing pegRNAs in both single-edit and batch mode. You can design against arbitrary DNA sequences (copy/paste your sequence as input), or you can enter genomic coordinates of your favorite gene in your favorite genome. Several species are currently supported, from human to plant. For base editors, just choose which nucleotide change you want to make and the software will take into account both the mutation and editing window to figure out the best editor to use. For prime editing, you can test all kinds of reverse transcriptase template (RTT) and primer binding site (PBS) lengths with a click of a button. The output is a table of possible gRNAs/pegRNAs, ordered by a heuristic score.

Sebastian tested PnB Designer by designing pegRNAs to model most of the human disease-associated mutations in ClinVar using prime editing. He even varied RTT and PBS length for each of these 96,000+ mutations, figuring out good parameters to keep pegRNAs at a reasonable length while still modelling ~80% of all variants.

This was a challenging but exciting side-project for Sebastian’s Masters’ degree. He wrote PnB Designer independently during the lockdown, and the rest of the lab acted as beta testers to provide suggestions. Congrats to Sebastian on your first paper, which is already being used by several people in the Zurich area. PnB Designer is completely free to use and is hosted by the Functional Genomics Center Zurich.

X Close

When using CRISPR genome editing in stem cells, it’s far easier to break a gene with indels than to fix it with HDR. This manifests in an interesting way. If you monitor a “CD34+” population of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) from the bone marrow, indels start high and stay high but HDR alleles are lost over time. Why do these different genetic outcomes differ over time? Is HDR bad for the long-term stem cells? Or is editing in the CD34+ population actually heterogeneous, and different cells get different alleles? New work from postdoc Jenny Shin in the lab, out in Cell reports, both answers this question and finds a way to fix the problem.

Jenny and collaborators used a powerful combination of immunophenotyping, next generation sequencing, and single-cell RNA-sequencing to investigate and reprogram genome editing outcomes in subpopulations of adult human CD34+ HSPCs. These HSPCs are actually several different types of cells, including more differentiated progenitors that cycle and very “stemmy” long-term HSCs that are quiescent. The team found that there is a dramatic tension between HDR and quiescence in LT-HSCs.  Quiescent stem-enriched cells utilize NHEJ and exhibit almost no HDR. By contrast, non-quiescent cells with the same immunophenotype utilize both NHEJ and HDR. Quiescence is critical for engraftment and stem cell maintenance, so it was now clear that all cells in the CD34+ population get indels and the cycling progenitors were getting HDR alleles, but the quiescent LT-HSCs weren’t doing HDR.

Jenny then had a very creative idea. She asked if a previously reported small molecule cocktail, “XRC”, that maintains quiescence could be used after the fact to re-quiesce LT-HSCs. Using this new strategy and good timing, she found a way to get LT-HSCs with high levels of HDR by briefly allowing them to cycle during editing, and then inducing quiescence later on. This yielded a 6-fold increase in the HDR/NHEJ ratio in quiescent stem cells ex vivo and during long-term engraftment in mouse experiments. The re-quiescence strategy might in future be combined with engineered Cas9-geminin constructs that reduce NHEJ, further tipping the balance towards HDR. Jenny’s results highlight the tradeoffs between editing and fundamental cellular physiology and suggests strategies to manipulate quiescent cells for research and therapeutic genome editing. 

X Close

Three people joined the lab, all in one day! Erman is a postdoc, interested in DNA repair and genome editing, Kinga is our new lab manager, and will be keeping us all in line. Markus is a bioinformatician, working on quantifying editing outcomes from complex datasets. Welcome to the lab!

X Close

Are you interested in working on genome editing, DNA repair, and organelle quality control in a dynamic lab environment? We are seeking a technician/lab manager and a bioinformatics scientist. Apply at the links below.

Technician / Lab Manager

Bioinformatics Scientist

X Close

We had an slightly belated American Thanksgiving in Zürich, complete with turkey, stuffing, mashed potatoes, and gravy. After eating more than our fill, we all walked down to a big Weinachtsmarkt for Glühwein. A great start to the holiday season!

X Close